Category Archives: Ideas

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about politics. Maybe it’s just the election coming up, where I encourage all eligible voters (even the ones that disagree with me) to go out and vote, because it’s important. At least, it should be, and maybe it would be if more people bothered. Last time, Canadians set a new record for poorest voter turnout in nearly a century and a half. Pick five eligible voters at random – odds are, two of them couldn’t be bothered to vote last time. Is anyone surprised that we have a system where the politicians don’t seem to care what the electorate thinks? Where they seem to think they can get away with damn near anything short of drowning baby seals in orphan tears without fearing voter reprisal? Quebec seems to be doing better, I’d really like to know what their secret is to getting the young to vote. I suspect, being in the middle of that age range myself, that the 1995 referendum (won by fewer than 55000 votes) may have convinced the youths there that their vote does indeed matter.

So, what’s the secret to changing this? How bad do things have to get before people care enough to get out and vote? I rather like this guy‘s idea: lower the voting age to 16, and get the high school teachers motivating the students to get involved. Perhaps more attention given to ridings that had particularly close votes in the media, particularly the online and social media that younger voters are more likely to be paying attention to. Perhaps we just need things to get screwed up enough that people finally get angry enough to go out and vote, but that’s a situation I’d rather not see. I’m definitely going to do my part this time and vote (as I have in every election since I turned 18), as well as encouraging everyone I know to get their butts down to the polls and have their say. It seems that our elections are decided by the seniors, since they turn out more reliably than youths, and they tend to vote conservative. I suspect this can be traced to two things: older people tend to be more socially conservative, and they don’t have to deal with the long term consequences of Conservative policies. Because they’re old and won’t live for very long.

What would I like to see, you ask? (I’m assuming you’re asking. You’re reading my blog, so I’m taking it as a given that you value my opinions. Or you’re here to leave some French casino spam.) Well, if I was running for office in this election (which I’m not, since the deadline has passed, and I haven’t got the time or money to run independently at the moment and I lack the connections to get nominated by any of the parties anyways), this would be my platform. If you are running in this or any future election, please feel free to take these ideas and not screw them up too badly.

First up would be to fix the broken first past the post system. How does 37.6% of the vote turn into 46.4% of the seats? While 18.2% turns into 12.0% of the seats, and 8% of the votes turn into 0 seats? The Green Party got nearly a million votes, and the BQ with 1.3 million votes got 49 seats while the Greens got none. Something seems wrong here. So the first thing, the day one thing, is to fix that. This should have been fixed years ago, decades ago. Why not? Because the people that have the power to change it are those least motivated to do so (because they benefit the most from it). The only parties that take it seriously are the ones that can’t get into power because this system keeps them marginalized.

My second goal if I found myself in office would be to break up the skewed power structure we’ve got in this (and, sadly, many if not most) countries. Elections can be bought, laws and politicians can be bought, and nothing seems to be able to change that. And, hey, surprise! The politicians that get money from the rich and powerful focus heavily on pushing through legislation to help the rich and powerful. The tax code, the budget, and the legal system in its entirety need a top-down scrubbing to make them fit what I feel should be the goal of any decent government: serving the voters, all of the voters, as best as is humanly possible and as fairly as possible. Preschoolers can be taught to play fair, so why does this seem to be so hard to pull off in a parliament allegedly composed entirely of competent adults?

I’ve spent a lot of time recently (well, it seems like a lot of time, but only by virtue of the seeming scarcity of free time these days) trying to kick-start myself into some sort of usable bilingualism.  The previously mentioned app I’ve got on my iPhone is pretty handy at picking up grammar, and the quizzes on Kim’s website help. There’s a companion app that helps with kanji studying, but one thing I feel that would help me would be to pick a set of words (rather than kanji) to learn each week. Ideally, they’d be words in a set, so that they can be used together to make full sentences, and even better if each week’s vocabulary built on the previous one. Since being able to put together sentences with all this memorized grammar is a goal, at least one verb should be included, and a good blend of parts of speech overall would be ideal. As an added bonus, this could be easily recycled for any language that has similar vocabulary. Now to just pick a subject; most Japanese guides seem to put a big focus on school vocabulary (hence why I can recite (if not write) many words I rarely use, such as 先生 (sensei, teacher), 学生 (gakusei, student), 学校 (gakkou, school), 勉強 (benkyou, study), etc. So, why not a handy wordlist for things I’m more likely to do? How about this?

Family Time

  • Family -  【かぞく】 (n,adj-no)
  • Play - ぶ 【あそぶ】 (v5b,vi)
  • Father – 【ちち】 (n) (hum)/父さん 【おとうさん】 (n) (hon)
  • Mother – 【はは】 (n) (hum)/お母さん 【おかあさん】 (n) (hon)
  • Daughter – 【むすめ】 (n)/お嬢さん 【おじょうさん】 (n) (hon)
  • Son – 【むすこ】 (n) (hum) / 息子さん 【むすこさん】 (n) (hon)
  • Ball – 【たま】 (n)
  • Toy – おもちゃ (n) (uk)

(Words grabbed out of WWWJDIC.) Now, let’s try a sentence. 息子では、父や娘が遊んだ. 今晩には、父や娘遊ぶ.

Recycling

April 26, 2010

As I noticed the growing pile of old milk cartons and apple juice containers in the back of my van, I had a thought. Yes, shocking, I know. A thought. From me. Yes. I’ll give you a moment to recover. Now, I understand that Alberta is not unique in that in Alberta you are required to pay, at the time of purchase, a deposit on beverage containers. You know, milk jugs, pop cans, beer bottles, juice boxes, that sort of thing. We’re even pretty good at it here – we’ve got an 81% return rate, which seems pretty good. I just think we can do better.

Many of the “quick service restaurants” (i.e., fast food joints) that I’ve been to (far too often) offer alternatives to the fountain drinks for people that don’t want to kill themselves with Coke or Sprite or whatever, but still want to kill themselves with fast food. These options are usually sold in ready to serve containers, the kind with a $0.10 deposit. The only place I can recall that actually has somewhere other than the trash to put these is the mall. Everywhere else, they either get abandoned on the table, wherever the trays go, or, ultimately, in the garbage (and I suspect that most employees cleaning up will take the ones on the table or with the trays and trash them). This seems like such a simple problem to fix. Get the restaurants to put a bin for them near the garbage (a single bin located somewhere else in the restaurant won’t work as well, people are too lazy). Heck, fund it through the levies on the containers – it’s gotta be cheaper than billboards and TV ads. And the restaurant operators probably wouldn’t mind it, either, if they got to keep the refunds on the containers (after the bins were paid for). How many Happy Meal milk cartons would have to come back to pay for some bins around Mickey Dee’s? The restaurants win (they get to look environmentally conscious, they get to keep the deposit money once the implementation costs are covered), the ABCRC wins (they get the containers back), everybody wins (since the ABCRC doesn’t take in tax money, and less garbage is good for just about everybody).

 

OK. Seriously. What is with handshaking, anyway? Maybe I’m just weird, but I’d like to go on the record as being against it. These guys have the right idea. Personally, I’ve always rather felt that a good rule of thumb is that if I don’t know you, I probably don’t want to touch you. Also, stranger, if you’re going to shake my hand, then mention that you are living outside (I was able to guess that one pretty accurately anyway), and also just got out of the hospital with pneumonia, uh… don’t. Please. Also, it is very interesting that pneumonia feels like being stabbed. I can honestly say that that had not occurred to me. I mean, I’ve had pneumonia, but I’ve never been stabbed, so I just never made the connection. I think I’m okay with that.

 

By responding to a site mentioned in a post in Dave Willis’ Livejournal, specifically the warning for Christians hosted there.

Now, normally I try like hell to avoid debate on this topic. Why? Because

  1. Your opinion sure won’t change, will it? You’re absolutely correct!
  2. My opinion sure won’t change, because I’m always right!

That’s pretty much how this sort of debate goes. The debate, of course, is Creationism vs. Evolutionism. Now, why does this site merit a response?

Because it’s called Evolution Fairytale Discussion Forum: A place for honest, civil dialogue on origins, and it’s laughable. Willis does a mighty fine job explaining why that name is so funny, and I won’t repeat it here, except to suggest that it should have had a Transformers reference somewhere.

Second, I’d like to admit that Fred Williams is right. Specifically,”the committed evolutionist activist is always, I mean always, socially liberal”. I’ve never observed this to be untrue, but I suspect it’s more the converse: fundamentalist Christians tend to be socially conservative. Especially funny considering that by many standards, Jesus was a liberal. Although I would have a tough time agreeing that he’s the sort of liberal who would associate with half the politicians calling themselves liberals ;) .

One point I will disagree with is that “it is not evidence but worldview that drives [creationists]; they simply do not want to be convinced“. I would invite him (or anyone interested) to point me at one single piece of evidence in favour of creationism. It’s not possible. Faith, by definition, requires that there be no evidence. Evidence denies faith. The bible is not evidence of creationism, any more than the homepage of Flying Spaghetti Monsterism is evidence of anything. Anyone can write something down and claim it is the truth. I will admit, it takes an enormous amount of charisma to spread your word to endure the millennia, but if charisma was all it took to make something true, then used car salesmen and lawyers would be more popular.

Okay, that was fun. You’d hardly believe I spent 12 years in Catholic schools, would you? And I know you wouldn’t believe me if I said that I’m not an atheist. Let’s get some replies now.

Transit

June 20, 2006

I think part of why Edmonton seems to have trouble with transit ridership (and thus requires constant ad campaigns touting the numerous advantages of riding the bus or LRT) is that it just isn’t always the best choice. Take my trip to work, for instance. According to Google Earth, about 5.2 kilometers (and a 5 minute trip, all the evidence I need that Google has never seen the traffic on 149 Street at rush hour).

  • By car: Around 10 minutes
  • On foot: Around an hour
  • By bus: Actual time moving on the bus, less than an hour. Amount of time required by the bus schedules, about 90 minutes, including a 20+ minute wait at Westmount Transit Center.

Bicycle time coming as soon as I get a new bicycle and figure out a route that doesn’t involve traffic-related suicide.